Owning a Stako bottle myself I am interested in the safety aspects however, there is a due process to follow in verification. For example the Stako bottle is CE approved therefore complies with European Union regulation standards and as a result is considered safe and fit for purpose, just like other similar CE bottles.
If a specialist company then proceeds to allege that Stako bottles are not safe then there needs to be testing to confirm compliance with the related CE standard and the in use application. It would be normal practice for a 3rd party to carry out testing to verify the actual performance of the bottles. This would be the point at which the bottles are confirmed un-safe or otherwise.
It is fair for organisations or companies to raise safety issues but hard to justify safety statements without a means to formally to backup such statements.
I would like to find out if there is any fault with Stako bottles but it is hard to see where this is going as it does not seam to be following a due process. To knock Stako at this stage for investigating the claims seams a bit unfair, one could equally knock Millennium or H-pac for not filling Stako bottles on a temporary basis and then engaging in dialogue to confirm if there is actually an issue.
Perhaps better questions would be;
1 – What testing is being carried out to confirm the performance and safety of Stako bottles?
2 – What are the time scales for the any such testing?
3 – Is the testing going to be verified by a 3rd party?
In the meantime I will have to have a think before using my Stako bottle.